<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opinions on Open &#187; workshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onopen.net/tag/workshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onopen.net</link>
	<description>Open writings on open education, open technology, open governance, and the general state of open affairs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:29:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Peer 2 Peer in action in Berlin</title>
		<link>http://onopen.net/2009/11/20/peer-2-peer-in-action-in-berlin/</link>
		<comments>http://onopen.net/2009/11/20/peer-2-peer-in-action-in-berlin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Park</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Educational Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2PU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2pu workshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer 2 peer university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onopen.net/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Photo by John Britton CC BY-SA
A Peer 2 Peer University co-founder recently posed this question to our tight knit community of volunteers: &#8220;Where are we in terms of P2PU&#8217;s evolution (one guy with his shirt off, or three people falling over themselves?)&#8221; Of course, this question was in reference to this infamous YouTube video of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:center; padding:10px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/johndbritton/4118942930/in/set-72157622714763003"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19163 alignnone" title="p2pu light" src="http://onopen.net/wp-content/p2pu-light.jpg" alt="p2pu light" width="661" height="495" /></a><br />
<small>Photo by John Britton <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en">CC BY-SA</a></small></div>
<p>A <a href="http://p2pu.org/">Peer 2 Peer University</a> co-founder recently posed this question to our tight knit community of volunteers: &#8220;Where are we in terms of P2PU&#8217;s evolution (one guy with his shirt off, or three people falling over themselves?)&#8221; Of course, this question was in reference to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA8z7f7a2Pk">this infamous YouTube video</a> of the Sasquatch music festival where, if you haven&#8217;t seen it, one lone naked dude starts an awesome dance party. I have to say, that after our inaugural workshop last week in Berlin, I think we&#8217;re past the point of three people falling over themselves. We were probably (definitely) in that phase during the pilot, where we stumbled through our courses, attempting to cohere and make sense of things, but without the glue to pull it all together. Even after the pilot and before the workshop, we sort of looked back and saw the different pieces and couldn&#8217;t quite put it together in our heads. For one thing, we didn&#8217;t know each other. Instead of a face without a name, it was more like an email without a face, anonymous @ placeholders populating our inboxes. Secondly, we knew we were scattered around the globe, which somehow deepened the mental disconnect. And finally, though we all had different reasons for volunteering, I suspect most of us had joined thinking it would simply be a fun experiment. Sure, why not organize a course online? It&#8217;s only six weeks of my time. An online book club? Sounds fun, and most importantly, noncommittal. If the pilot tanks (or even if it doesn&#8217;t), we can always pull out. We&#8217;re only volunteers after all. At least, that&#8217;s how I felt.</p>
<p>Then the <a href="http://p2pu.org/Workshop">P2PU workshop</a> transpired. But before I dive into that, let me give newbies some background into what P2PU is, and what it&#8217;s all about (or at least, has become). I think Larry hit the nail on the head when he <a href="http://www.p2pu.org/Break-Out-5-Notes">said that</a>, &#8220;P2PU is the social learning wrapper around OER.&#8221; More elaborately <a href="http://www.p2pu.org/About-P2PU">stated</a>, &#8220;The mission of P2PU is to leverage the power of the Internet and social software to enable communities of people to support learning for each other. P2PU combines open educational resources, structured courses, and recognition of knowledge/learning in order to offer high-quality low-cost education opportunities. It is run and governed by volunteers.&#8221; It&#8217;s an idea that was dreamed up and shaped by five founders a year or so ago, that materialized into an initiative called Peer 2 Peer University, manifesting itself in both virtual (<a href="http://p2pu.org/">p2pu.org</a>) and physical (<a href="http://p2pu.org/Team">p2pu.org/Team</a>) forms. We launched the pilot with seven courses (seven+ volunteer course organizers, plus volunteers around tech and admin issues) on 09.09.09. The pilot ran for six weeks, during which time we saw a good number of participants drop off like flies. The majority of our participants had full time jobs, were full time moms or dads, or were otherwise engaged with non-virtual life. There was also the issue of multiple tech platforms (blogs, wikis, etc.) which not all of us or our participants were fully familiar or comfortable with. Basically, it was a true pilot, from start to finish.</p>
<p>So we learned a lot about what didn&#8217;t work, but how to transform that knowledge into progress?</p>
<div style="float:right; padding:10px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/johndbritton/4118943532/in/set-72157622714763003"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19163 alignnone" title="wall of ideas" src="http://onopen.net/wp-content/wall-of-ideas.jpg" alt="wall of ideas" width="491" height="369" /></a><br />
<small>Photo by John Britton <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en">CC BY-SA</a></small></div>
<p>Well, with <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/iphilipp/1379467868/">one awesome facilitator</a> to keep us on target and <a href="hhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/kiyanwang/4105388557/in/set-72157622683439167/">another one</a> to keep us moving forward, we put our heads together and brainstormed our way through four intense days of workshop. We set the agenda on the first day in post-its&#8211;the <a href="http://p2pu.org/Wall-of-Ideas">Wall of Ideas</a>&#8211;and then proceeded to take the wall apart piece by piece in break-out sessions in the days ensuing. Personally leery of group work, I was at first skeptical about these group sessions, where we were split off into three groups of four&#8211;how much could we really accomplish with three disparate group resolutions? How much consensus could we really reach? And wouldn&#8217;t we end up hating each other in the end having to work, live, <em>and</em> play with each other? (Especially me with my penchant for disliking most people upon first meeting?)</p>
<p>First impressions, even if they are unpleasant (which they weren&#8217;t), don&#8217;t last long when you have a group of truly genuine, intelligent, and like-minded people together in one space for four days. Maybe it was Berlin, or the uber hip design space we were working in, or the fact that we all cared about the basic innovative idea of P2PU (peers learning from peers outside the ivy walls of tradition)&#8211;whatever it was, and as cheesy as it may sound, we truly connected. There was not one person who came out of that workshop who was skeptical of what we had accomplished or where we were headed. Some of us may have started out that way, myself included, but by the end we were ready to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kiyanwang/4106135750/in/set-72157622683439167/">change the world</a>, or at least the unbounded universe of education.</p>
<div style="float:left; padding:10px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/johndbritton/4118948218/in/set-72157622714763003"><img title="wall of organized ideas" src="http://onopen.net/wp-content/wall-of-organized-ideas.jpg" alt="wall of organized ideas" width="491" height="369" /></a><br />
<small>Photo by John Britton <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en">CC BY-SA</a></small></div>
<p>It was amazing how much consensus we reached after the hours of discussion in groups and report-backs to the group at large, how much concrete progress we made in terms of objectives and volunteered tasks to achieve those objectives. I think the moment when I knew I was part of one of the most functional groups of people I have ever worked with was near the end on Saturday during the <a href="http://p2pu.org/Technology-Notes">tech session</a>. <a href="http://www.johndbritton.com/">John</a> got up after our report-backs for what we&#8217;d like to see created (because the idea of casual changes to an existing platform did not even cross our minds) and laid out a schedule of deadlines and feedback dates where this was all going to be implemented. My jaw dropped&#8211;really? Since when did developers ever set deadlines like this, and since when did those deadlines ever come to mean anything? Especially <em>volunteer</em> developers? I was floored. I think we all were, not to mention incredibly humbled by this collective vision that had somehow coalesced from our individual ambitions and presented itself to us unawares.</p>
<p>I may sound like a giant cheese ball, but I really, truly appreciated the presence of every single person I met in Berlin. Throughout the group discussions and individual conversations I had with people, not to forget the dinners and yes, not entirely sober dance sessions, I really got to know each and every P2PU volunteer as more than just an @ placeholder, and as someone who was contributing to some larger effort just like me, on an entirely voluntary basis. I think in the end that is the crux of P2PU, that it&#8217;s made up of and run by volunteers&#8211;people who are willing to risk their time and effort to realize a vision that may not be realizable.</p>
<p>There are various theories as to why this happens in groups, one of which we discussed over our last dinner&#8211;that a part of a person&#8217;s brain shuts off when she or he feels part of a larger group effort, essentially positing that some part of her nature is satisfied that was previously working to be satisfied (maybe?)&#8211;but theorizing aside, P2PU is a lot more concrete and unidirectional than it once was. We have a real agenda and a community vision, and we&#8217;re headed towards it. I&#8217;d say that makes us more than three people falling over themselves. We&#8217;re somewhere in between three people and the awesome dance party that erupts at the end. We&#8217;re in the growing stages, and I&#8217;m willing to stick around &#8217;til the end, if there is such a thing.</p>
<div style="float:center; padding:10px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kiyanwang/4105380631/"><img class="aligncenter" title="p2pu gang" src="http://onopen.net/wp-content/p2pu-gang.jpg" alt="p2pu gang" width="556" height="370" /></a><small>Photo by kiyanwang <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en">CC BY-NC-SA</a></small></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://onopen.net/2009/11/20/peer-2-peer-in-action-in-berlin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

